How mount differs from Component
masterWhile the Component framework is a popular industry standard for managing lifecycle via inversion of control (treating components as objects), mount is designed as a lightweight library that leverages Clojure's native namespace and dependency system.
Key conceptual differences:
- Integration:
Componentis a framework requiring 'whole app buy-in' (everything must be a component), whereasmountis a library that allows you to adddefstateincrementally to any existing application. - Mental Model:
Componentuses an Object-Oriented approach (objects and methods), whilemountuses a functional/namespace approach (namespaces and vars). - Dependency Management:
Componentuses a dedicated dependency library to build a graph;mountrelies on the Clojure compiler's:requireand:usemechanisms to determine the order of states. - Complexity:
mountreduces boilerplate by using a simpledefstatemacro instead of requiring records, protocols, and lifecycle implementations.