Evidence provided in an audit is only considered substantive if it meets the following criteria:
- Names the exact subject and surface being inspected.
- Explains why the verdict follows from the rule (rather than just providing an example).
- Records measured or mechanical support where the rule requires it.
- Names peers or dependencies for relation verdicts.
- Avoids bare phrases like
no issue, checked, or matches policy.
Important Distinction: Search output, inventories, formatter success, test success, finding counts, and reviewer summaries are considered probes or command evidence, not findings. A finding must identify the current source or artifact row, criterion, actionable defect, and relevant peer or dependency evidence.